Lawmakers in New York are examining why rent stabilization measures have not been widely adopted in upstate areas, despite being permitted by state law for six years. Assembly members Sarahana Shrestha and Linda Rosenthal are particularly concerned about the lack of price controls for apartments outside of Kingston, which remains the only upstate locality to have implemented such policies.
To address this issue, Assembly member Linda Rosenthal has scheduled a hearing to investigate the reasons behind the limited expansion of rent stabilization, according to a report by the Times Union.
The origins of rent control in New York City trace back to its introduction as a temporary measure. It was intended to be lifted once the city’s housing emergency—defined as having less than a 5 percent vacancy rate—was resolved. However, over time, rent control became entrenched. Supporters of the policy formed a strong constituency that influenced politicians to maintain the status quo rather than address housing shortages through increased development.
Currently, New York City’s vacancy rate stands at 1.4 percent, reflecting ongoing challenges in the rental market. Rent stabilization is also present in Kingston as well as Nassau, Westchester, and Rockland counties. These areas continue to experience high housing costs and competitive apartment searches.
A bill introduced in the last legislative session sought to create new pathways for establishing rent stabilization beyond relying solely on low vacancy rates. The measure did not pass but could be revisited as lawmakers seek ways to expand tenant protections and address affordability concerns across more regions of New York State.
“Nothing in the world is worth having or worth doing unless it means effort, pain, difficulty,” said Teddy Roosevelt. “Affordable housing should be no exception.”
